~~By InsightAnalytical-GRL
What, with Sharia Law creeping into our Treasury Department, Pakistani women trying to fend off the encroaching Taliban, etc. etc., it’s so good to hear that The One is so clear on the status of women when it comes to freedom. Go on over to Not Your Sweetie’s great post for some choice comments about Obama’s little lecture about morality and ethics ad how the Freedom of Choice Act isn’t a big priority for the Ego-in- Chief:
Freedom of Choice Act – not a priority, and not “freedom” either
While women here in the U.S. bask in our knowledge The One thinks our reproductive decisions should be run past “our clergy”, let’s see how that works in places like Saudi Arabia.
Here’s the latest indignity to consider:
Saudis clamp down on women’s gyms
(SNIP_
Women’s gyms have become popular in the ultra-conservative Muslim country where the sexes are heavily segregated.
But only clubs linked to medical groups can get licenses and others will be closed, the Arab News newspaper said.
Saudi women were reported to have launched an online campaign in protest called Let Her Get Fat.
Government departments are not allowed to issue licenses for commercial gyms and sports clubs for women, unlike facilities for men, the newspaper reported.
No more hiding gyms behind the doors of beauty salons…
Amazingly, some very courageous woman fighting back:
A group of women launched an internet campaign in protest against the move, saying facilities linked to medical clinics were too expensive, and their health would suffer as a result of the closures.
Woman are so precious in Saudi Arabia that they really MUST go to gyms linked to medical clinics. The reasoning behind this must be surveillance, right?
As the article concludes:
Women in Saudi Arabia are banned from driving, must wear a head-to-toe cloak when out in public and must obtain permission from a male relative to work, travel, study or marry.
And the Guardian reports that the clergy, of course, consider gyms for women “shameless.”
As a trade-off there’s been talk of letting women vote, but with the half-brother of King Abdullah looking strong as a possible successor, this sop doesn’t offer much solace. After all, Prince Nayef, who acts as interior minister, said “the kingdom had no need of either women MPs or elections” just last month.
So now, many Saudi women won’t be able to the gym.
Meanwhile, the “President” who bows to the Saudi leader tells us that FOCA isn’t a priority.
I would like to use a string of profanity at this point, but it’s not good for my blood pressure.
By the way, thank goodness I can still go to the gym and work off the stresses of putting up with the insufferable Obama crowd…
UPDATE
With the news that David Souter is retiring from the Supeme Court, do you trust an Obama appointment?? This is the guy who wanted to vote to confirm John Roberts, but didn’t because of political expediency…
Obama could halt a lot of this “interpretation of the Constitution” stuff by pushing for FOCA and getting the court out of the “privacy” issue…but he continues to dance around. His “one hand giveth and the other taketh away” approach to women seems to leave women on the short end as we’re used for bargaining chips. Well, he’s a misogynist, so why is that surprising?
Filed under: Current Politics | Tagged: Barack Obama, BBC, David Souter, Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), John Roberts, King Abdullah, Let Her Get Fat website, misogynist, misogyny, Not Your Sweetie, Obama Administration, Pakistani women, Prince Nayef, privacy, reproductive rights, Saudia Arabia, Sharia Law, Supreme Court, the Taliban | 9 Comments »