Nancy Pelosi Talks about Hillary during an Interview about Her New Book “Know Your Power: A Message to America’s Daughters” (Ironic Title, Isn’t It?) (UPDATE 1X)

I spotted it in USA Weekend Magazine over breakfast…a little squib in the “Who’s News” column about Pelosi’s new book.

According to Lorrie Lynch, the columnist who puts together this page,

Pelosi told her she wrote the book because “other people were writing my story; I thought I should.” She wants our daughters to know that “power is within them.” They should “have faith in themselves, set their path and be ready for opportunity.”

I nearly spit up my tea as I read this claptrap.

Lynch usually seems to be oblivious to what’s going on, preferring to focus on the celebrity aspect of her interviews.  The rest of the current column is full of answers to questions from readers which are extremely important. For example, the question right under the Pelosi squib asks whether George Clooney is half-Greek or half-Italian…

I’ve caught Lynch in the past showing her biases toward political figures, so I was on the lookout for a lot of fawning, especially since she met Pelosi years ago–24 years ago–at the Democratic Convention in San Francisco.

By the way, the convention she’s referring to is the 1984 convention where Geraldine Ferraro was nominated for Vice President to run with Walter Mondale.  Twenty-four years ago…gee, haven’t we come a long way, baby?

Lynch did a full interview with Pelosi, so I went over to her blog to see what was there.

Lynch got off to a slow start with a very insightful question about whether being the chair of the host committee during that convention was as hard as being head of the national party now.  OK…

Pelosi was given the chance to shower women readers with loads of advice:

LL: You say in the book that women should know their power but keep the faith. Talk about what you mean by keeping the faith.

NP: I wanted to convey to women they can do anything if they know the power and keep the faith. The power is within them. The faith is within them, too. So, it’s about themselves. They should  be themselves, have confidence in that… set their path, set themselves on a track, or not, but be ready for whatever opportunities come along.  When you and I sat down 24 years ago when I was chair of the host committee if you had said to me in three years you’ll be in Congress I would’ve said that’s totally impossible.  But, when your transitions are revealed to you it’s important to recognize them and to give your faith and confidence in yourself if it’s what you want to do.

Hear that, PUMA women? Nancy tells us to “keep the faith.”

Nancy also spoke of her fondness for Washington, D.C. and San Francisco…you won’t believe this prattle:

Washington…inspires me to honor the entrepreunerial spirit of our founders. And my city of San Francisco is  a city built on optimism and entrepreunerial spirit and all the rest. I take the optimism and the fresh new ideas of California to Washington every week, respectful of the traditions that are there but connected with the spirit of our founders to make change for the future, to take risks, be bold and make the future better for our children.

Somehow I’ve missed all that boldness and risk taking she’s been doing lately on behalf of us…and she sure likes the word “entrepreunerial,” doesn’t she?

But Lynch managed to ask a few pointed questions about Pelosi’s thoughts on Hillary Clinton. These “thoughts” are mealy-mouthed, weasely and scripted, of course:

LL: In your book you talk about cracking the marble ceiling in the Capitol. In the primary campaign we heard a lot about breaking the ultimate glass ceiling. Do you feel any disappointment  — or that it’s a setback for women — that Sen. Clinton did NOT become the nominee?

NP: Sen. Clinton made a tremendous and courageous effort to win the White House. She made it clear a woman can be president, serve as commander in chief, has the knowledge, the courage and the stamina to be president of the United States. What Sen. Clinton did can never be considered a setback because she advanced the cause enormously, she almost won. You can’t call that a setback because no woman had come that far, gained that much support  blazing the trail for herself, for the future, for other women. It was progress, it was ground breaking and it is because of Sen. Clinton that those strides were made.

LL: The question now is, if not Hillary, than who? Who will be the first woman president? You may be in the most unique place to know who else is out there with the talent and possibility. Is there anyone you think eight years from now could be  another great woman candidate?

NP: I wouldn’t rule out Sen. Clinton eight years from now but that’s up to her. But in addition to that, there are many U.S. senators and women governors and  women in the House of Representatives who could be on the path to the White House. But remember one thing: Eight years ago, no one had even heard of Barack Obama. So, we don’t know who it could be, but what we want to do is make sure there is enough encouragement of women to get involved in the process, to receive the kind of support to follow their aspirations. This  is not for the faint of heart.

LL: People from all backgrounds and walks of life supported Sen. Clinton and were excited about the possibility of a woman president.

NP: I think that’s true. There’s no question there was a great deal of exuberance for having a woman president. I can tell you from my own experience becoming Whip, (majority) leader and then Speaker of the House, the enthusiasm that I have seen for a woman standing in the path to power.
I think the public is way ahead of the politicians in terms of women doing whatever job they set out to do. Of course, older women want to see it, younger women are inspired by it, but what touched me when I reached power was the letters, communications, I would get from fathers of daughters that would say, ‘I’m so happy to see that you have reached the heights that you have for what it means for my daughter.’ It’s not just confined to women wanting women to be successful… It’s people looking to a new generation.

Well, Pelosi didn’t answer the question about whether she was “disappointed” about Hillary “losing” the nomination. And when Lynch asked her who would be the first woman President, if not Hillary, Pelosi moved right into the “next generation” talk.  I’d like to know, however, who exactly these “many” women senators, representatives and governors are that are poised to catapult into the forefront?  Who else has the experience, tenacity, and smarts of Clinton?

It’s pretty clear that Pelosi would be happy to see Hillary Clinton out of the way after this year.  She’s dead and buried as far as the Democratic leadership is concerned, PUMAS.  But we already knew that, didn’t we? She can gloss her words all she likes, but she isn’t fooling us!

The replies to this interview are interesting.  None seem to have mentioned Hillary so far, but they sure are critical of Pelosi!   Apparently, not all readers of Lorrie Lynch are ready to just “fall in line.”

And here’s little tidbit about Lynch and Keith Olbermann.  Back in April, Lynch made Olbermann’s “Worst Person in the World” list.  Why?

I only merited the third place WORSE for my item in Sunday’s print column on CNBCs’ reporter Erin Burnett. Keith was upset that I told readers how Burnett would not talk to us without her PR handler being in on the interview. In his rant (which you can view here) Keith chastizes me for not understanding that no public figure from “the president to Ashton Kutcher” is interviewed without his press handler sitting in.

Sorry Keith, I beg to differ. I’m proud to say we expect public figures to be able to answer questions without  their PR people in the room or on the phone. It makes for much better interviews. And my column is full of such conversations every week. In fact, in November of 2005, Keith himself was featured in the column (scroll down a bit for the item), having given a lovely interview that was completely handler-free.

How rich is this?? A gossip columnists displays some “journalistic integrity” and that guy who thinks he’s Edward R. Murrow disses her for not wanting handlers with interviewees?

Unreal…as is Nancy Pelosi.  Just unreal…

UPDATE Thursday, August 7, 2008

Hate to report anything from Drudge, but he quotes the Nielsen Bookscan as reporting that Pelosi’s book has sold 2,737 copies during its first week and this after the USA Weekend push.

By contrast, the anti-Obama title, OBAMA NATION, has sold 21,466, according to a Drudge “insider.”

Looks like the people are speaking!!

13 Responses

  1. Great article GRL. I hope you keep skewering the repugnant Pelosi as she so richly deserves.

    Nancy Pelosi is indicative of what I think is the real thing that is holding women back. Other women.

    Women are the majority in the country. And there are plenty of good decent men, real men, that aren’t afraid of a woman with guts and brains that vote with us on women’s issues and problems. So why are there only 90 women combined in the Senate and the House?

    I remember how happy I was when Pelosi became speaker. I cheered her words “there’s a new congress in town”. And waited for the fur to fly. And waited. And waited. Still waiting….

    What I forgot is that mediocrity, lies, and incompetence comes in two genders. Pelosi is as big a phony as the phony she supports. I loathe her. I hope Cindy puts a dent in her arrogance and little honest re-election fear in her complacency.

    Remember the good old days when we used to laugh at Republicans for voting against their own interests? Laughs on us if we keep voting for people that recognize the women’s rights are human rights like our standard bearer said over ten years ago.

  2. Great essay GRL. Pelosi is definitely part of the problem, not the solution. If Obama does not win in November, I think she will be another one, along with Dean, who will have to move along.

    It is interesting how she emphasis the word entreprenurial. I guess I never thought of the founding fathers in quite that way before.

    Bottom line, Pelosi is full of it. I have lost all respect for her, notwithstanding her achievements. She has helped divide the party and set back the progress of women for many years all at the same time. She also took impeachment off the table. Hard to admire all of that.

  3. Could it be that dear Mrs. Pelosi wants to be the first woman president herself? After her behavior during this primary season, she can forget that idea. I, for one of many, hope she loses not only her speakership, but also her seat in the house.

  4. Having lived in the Bay Area for 30 years and once liking Nancy, I can’t stand her now. What a huge disappointment. Had she pursued impeachment of those crooks and liars who currently inhabit the People’s House, maybe she would have been President – but she’s shown no backbone and most likely never will.

    If Obama is nominated at the convention, he – and his supporters like Nancy, Howard, Donna – will be kicked to the curb by the people who are the landlords of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

  5. Nancy Pelosi ‘s New Book “Know Your Power: A Message to America’s Daughters”

    If this was in a comic political novel, people would complain it’s too over the top to be funny….actually I can’t decide whether this book and title are meant to be a piss in the face of women, or Nancy is so delusional that she believes she is the finest example of a powerful woman leader in the US ?? Just like I can’t decide if the Dems really want to win, or simply stop Hillary???

  6. Nancy Pelosi is the bungler Bella Abzug was talking about years ago, when she said a woman schlemiel should be promoted as quickly as a male. Great to know we have come so far.

  7. Nancy Pelosi is one of the reasons this former democrat will be voting straight repubublican this year. She is a freak. I don’t know of any other way to send a message to the fools running this freak show.

  8. I really believe that Nancy Pelosi is as enamored of herself as Obama is. I also think that she relishes being the woman with the highest office. I think this explains fully why she NEVER supported Hillary. Nancy will be quite happy when Obama picks some boring white guy as a running mate. It will maintain the status quo she worships.

  9. Exactly Pagan,

    Instead of embracing the idea of two strong powerful Democratic women Pelosi is afraid she’ll no longer be #1.

    Hopefully she won’t be #1 much longer anyway since she is a mediocrity that only looks good if you compare her to Denny Hastert.

    If she wanted to keep taking things on and off the table she should have gone into catering. We’d all have benefited from that!

    Øbama

  10. Did anyone else notice this…

    “…the enthusiasm that I have seen for a woman standing in the path to power.”

    I just find the word choice a little odd — standing “IN” the path to power. Shouldn’t this be “ON” the path to power?

    Seems like she means women are “in the way” rather than “on the way.” May be more a reflection of her own self worth, and self-hatred of powerful women than a real support for Obama. So many women would rather have the power vicariously through a man who has it. I wonder if this is partly where she feels she fits in, and why another woman (ie Hillary) can’t have it; because she couldn’t have it vicariously through another female.

    Anyway, kenoshaMarge, the caterer comment is just too funny! Are you involved with PUMA

    just my two cents

  11. Sorry,

    involved with PUMA in Wi? How do I get involved?

  12. She Were The Mastermind Behind This Entire Process That Have Been Run Amok In The Honor Of Barack Obama, All Because Of Her Jealousy Of Senator Clinton Making Her Stronghold On Power A Very Short Lived One.Make No Mistake About It,This Is Nancy Pelosi’s Signature Endeavor From The Start Of This Campaign.She Made Sure That Barack Obama Were The Democratic Nominee In Waiting When A Time That This Country Needs And Cries Out For A True Proven Leader Of Senator Clinton’s Status That Has The Exposure Of Handling World,And Domestic Crisis For A Mystery Straight Out Of The Views Of These People……….Dean,Kerry,Kennedy,,Gore,Dukakais,McGovern,Bradley,Does This Ring A Bell For Anyone,Yeah That’s Right All LOSERS For The Run For President Of The United States And Donna Brazile,& Nancy Pelosi Contributed To The Failure Of Al Gore’s Cowardly Withdrawal To Concede To The Republicans,And Now They Have The Audacity To Try And Shove This Ignorant ism Down Our Throats,I Think Not Mrs Pelosi As You,And His Supporters Will See Come November

  13. Too bad it has sold like 2700 copies… drudge is calling her “speaker of the flop” ROFL.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: